Cornell AR Program Participants - AI Academic Integrity Experiences

Have you participated in the Accepting Responsibility program? A reporter wants to know Hi all. My name is Lee Gaines. I'm a reporter working on an assignment for the Hechinger Report about Cornell's response to academic integrity in the age of AI. I'm looking to talk to students who have participated in Cornell's "Accepting Responsibility" program. For anyone who hasn't heard of this, the AR program offers a workshop instead of the standard hearing and appeals process for some first-time academic integrity violations. Admins say that during the pilot phase of AR, more than half of the violations students got sent to the program for were AI-related. I'm interested in student perspectives; did the program help you handle academic challenges, clarify expectations around AI-use, and/or use AI in a way that doesn't undermine learning? Was it helpful or a waste of time? You don't need to comment here, or share anything sensitive under this post. You can DM me. Or email me: [email redacted]. We can discuss privacy and what you're comfortable sharing on the record before any interview. And I will only quote people with their explicit consent. And if you haven't participated in the AR program, I'm also intersted in hearing your general takes on Cornell's response to AI. Are professor policies on AI-use clear and/or fair? Have professors changed how they conduct exams? Anything else you think a reporter should know? Thanks!