Posted 9 days ago

Disaster Recovery Officials Who Are Survivors - HSVC

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฉ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ? In emergency management, we have always known something we never had a name for. When disaster strikes a community, the people sent to lead recovery are often the same people whose homes flooded, whose roofs blew off, whose children were displaced. The responder and the survivor live in the same body, the same population, the same experience. We have called this many things over the years. Compassion fatigue. Burnout. Secondary trauma. Local responder strain. Each of those names captures something real, but none of them captures the whole. The Helper-Survivor Vulnerability Convergence, or HSVC, is the framework I developed through my doctoral research with disaster recovery officials in the U.S. Virgin Islands. It names what happens when helper and survivor identity converge in a single person, at the same time, during the same event. At the center of that convergence is vulnerability, an understudied dimension of disaster leadership that shapes decision-making, retention, and long-term community recovery. HSVC is not a diagnosis. It is a lens. It helps us see why a responder keeps showing up to a shelter where her own neighbors are sleeping. Why a program manager attends a press conference in the morning and waits in a FEMA line in the afternoon. Why the very people most qualified to lead recovery are also the most quietly carrying it. Two identities. Two obligations. Two worlds. Converging in one person, in one moment, with no clean exit. The framework matters because what we cannot name, we cannot support. When organizations understand HSVC, they can build protocols, supervision structures, and recovery resources that recognize the responder as a whole human being, not a role that ends at quitting time. I introduced HSVC in my dissertation, ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜›๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด: ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜“๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ˆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜œ๐˜š๐˜๐˜ ๐˜‹๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ, the first GCU study to combine hermeneutic phenomenology (Ajjawi and Higgs framework) with disaster response. A peer-reviewed article extending HSVC is in development. My book, ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ, speaks to the why of survivorship, the duality of living in both roles, and the lessons learned that became the foundation of everything else. Running underneath both the book and the dissertation is what I call experiential intelligence, a term originally introduced by Robert Sternberg and later developed by Soren Kaplan as XQ. Experiential intelligence is not a substitute for technical training. It may be the essence of every intelligence. It is rooted in learning, understanding, and embodying. Two identities. Two obligations. Two worlds. One body. Researchers. Practitioners. Clinicians. Survivors. If this is your intersection, I want to hear from you.
Sourcee Logo

Brought to you by Sourcee

We find journo requests from across the web and deliver them directly to your inbox.

We Monitor the Web for Journo Requests