In a report from Law.com Compass' Pacesetter Research, 62% of those surveyed at US law firms said they think AI can (at least to an extent) help predict the outcomes of legal cases.
I'm looking to talk to law firm leaders about this. How are firms using AI for these purposes? Are there some types of cases where it's stronger and more accurate than in others? If you're skeptical, why? Is there a human element that makes these outcomes hard to predict?
Get in touch: [email redacted] or 215-557-2392.
Law.com Compass
Brought to you by Sourcee
We find journo requests from across the web and deliver them directly to your inbox.