Climate Journo Requests

Connect with journalists covering climate. From breaking news to in-depth features, discover relevant media opportunities from top publications in this category.

Never Miss a Climate Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Climate journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.

TravelTech Founders - Distribution, Traction & Fundability

Early stage startups don't know distribution. They know their product. They know the problem. Give a founder an hour and they'll walk you through every broken step in the workflow they're fixing. Ask how the market is supposed to find out. The answer gets thin. They build for a year and launch to their own contact list. They post once and wait. They pitch investors who have never heard their name, then call it a tough funding climate. I've watched good products lose to worse ones with better reach. That's not a product problem. The coverage exists. Most of it is media. I come at it from the other side of the table. I ran an agency, so I know whether a tool survives a real Monday or just demos well. I lost a company, so I know the difference between traction and activity. I trained with VCs, so I know when a good business is being pushed to raise money it shouldn't. Most coverage asks whether a company is interesting. I'm asking whether it works, whether it lasts, and whether it deserves capital. And when a founder clears all three, I don't just write about them. I introduce them. I work with them. So that's where @The Ticket by VENTUREA is going. https://lnkd.in/gURDptwx The founders building in Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality. What problem they saw. Why it matters. How they're going about fixing it. Alongside the trends actually moving this industry, including how AI is changing the way trips get planned and sold. If you invest, this is where you see what's being built before it's obvious. If you operate, this is where you see what's coming for your business. If you're building, this is where your work gets read by both. I'm interested in the technology that amplifies the impact of Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality. The problems worth solving. The startups going after them. Where this industry is heading. That's the whole reason this exists. One newsletter is not a distribution strategy. But it's a start, and most of these founders don't have one. Building something in travel? Send me a message. I want to hear about it. Subscribe below. See you in the next issue. #TravelTech #HospitalityTech #SoutheastAsia #Venturea #VentureCapital

Futurists, AI Researchers & Tech Builders - Visions Trade-Offs Ethics

A recurring theme I’ve noticed is that it’s really difficult to imagine the future. It’s easy to dismiss an idea … who would want that? Or decide it’s too complicated; it's something I can think about later. I’ve experienced this throughout my tech career. When I was a student studying computer science, over two decades ago, there were actually people telling me what was coming. I just didn’t have the foresight to understand what it would mean. A friend told me his supervisor had said that, in the future, every phone would have the internet. Another friend, who was really into mobile phones, told me that phones would eventually become like mini computers, with something called “apps” that would let you do things on your phone. One of my friends used machine learning for a university project. Her program had to run all night. My dissertation was about finding the shortest route between two points. Google Maps existed, but I remember it being much more like a digital map. I remember thinking that one day it would probably be able to work out the shortest route for you. Looking back, these things seem obvious. They weren’t obvious to me then. And I think that’s the interesting thing about the future. Even when we’re told what’s coming, it can be incredibly difficult to imagine how profoundly it might change the world around us. And we’re doing it again. Except this time, the stakes feel much higher. I’ve been speaking to people about the future and asking what kind of world they want to live in. They talk about climate change. Wealth inequality. Housing. Job opportunity. Peace. So the question I keep coming back to is: What does a better future for everyone actually look like? I want to speak to the people who are shaping what comes next — the people building, researching and thinking about the future. What are they trying to achieve? What kind of trade-offs are they making, and what kind of ethical questions are they asking themselves? I want to have deep conversations about what’s coming, what it could mean for us, and how we might stir ourselves towards building something better.

British Columbia Wildfire Resilience Practitioners - Project Barriers

Over the past few months, I've been having conversations with people involved in forestry and climate resilience projects across British Columbia. It started mostly out of curiosity. I wanted to better understand what actually happens between recognizing that something needs to be done and seeing a project implemented on the ground. At the beginning, I thought project coordination might be one of the main missing pieces. The more people I talk to, the more I'm realizing that coordination is definitely an important part of the picture, but there are other challenges that can come even before that. I've heard about land tenure and access, regulations and approvals, funding, technical capacity, project timelines, economics, and the challenge of coordinating different organizations and priorities. And what has been especially interesting is that I haven't been getting the same answer from everyone. Someone working with a Community Forest may see the problem very differently from someone working with a First Nation, a funding organization or as a forestry professional. That's probably been the most useful part of these conversations for me. I started looking for an answer and instead I'm finding better questions. So, over the next few weeks, I'd like to share some of these conversations and what I've been learning from the people who have been generous enough to give me some of their time. I'm definitely still learning about this space, so I'd also love to hear from people working directly on these projects: What usually makes a good wildfire resilience or forest health project difficult to actually get off the ground?

Systems-Change Event Organizers - Send Events Courses & Open Calls

There's more happening at the edges of capital, systems change and the living world than any one person can track. A series of events exploring the Three Horizons framework, the release of the TNFD 2026 Status Report, webinars exploring governance with the livings or the economy of right relationship. A free MIT course on systems change and inner work, open to anyone (starting today), and regenerative courses. And a lineup of events taking place in person in New York Climate Week. Most of it is virtual. Nearly all of it is open. It's scattered across organizations working on different pieces of the same shift (each with their own newsletter, calendar, and corner of the field). Ecologists call the place where two ecosystems meet an ecotone, and what happens there is the edge effect: more species, more activity, more life than in either system on its own. I grew up around those edges in Brittany, where forest gives way to meadow and land meets ocean along a long, restless coastline, and I've spent my career holding space for the human version, in awe of what happens where different fields meet. 🌱 So I've started Ecotone Shift, a ~monthly newsletter that gathers in one place: events, courses, open calls. Issue #1 is out today, and it includes the virtual session Capital Fieldnotes I’m hosting shortly after New York Climate Week. If you're running something that belongs in here, send it my way, I’d love to include in the next edition! Link in the comments. Themes: systems change • systems investing • regenerative thinking • regenerative finance • climate innovation and deeptech • narrative infrastructure • design • planetary boundaries • planetary futures • futuring • strategic foresight • nature governance

Owners With Two Generations Of Same EV Model - Battery Degradation

AVILOO published more than 500,000 battery tests on September 2, run between 2022 and 2026 across 20 models and four continents. The most useful result is not the model ranking, it is the spread measured between individual cars of the same model: up to 13.5 points of state of health. On a Model Y at 150,000 km, the observed range runs from 82.9 % to 94.9 %. I have a concrete case to set beside that, with its limits stated. Two Model X, same owner, same climate, same split between fast charging and home charging, and according to the available sources the same cell format and chemistry (18650 NCA). The first was sold on the day the second was delivered, December 15, 2023, which makes it possible to compare them at the same age. At two years and nine months, the 2016 Model X had lost roughly 5 % of its range, with approximately 98,000 km on the odometer. The 2023, at the same age, shows 18 % with 73,000 km. Three and a half times the degradation, on 25,000 km less. A reader added a case pointing the same way under one of my posts, and the screenshot is attached. Christophe Bretaud has owned four Teslas since 2013, 560,000 km in total. The two that have covered the most distance are his first ones, and they are down only 4 to 6 %, while his 2024 Model X is already at 12 % in two years and 60,000 km. Twelve percent in two years is 6 % a year, against 6.5 % a year for my 2023. I do not know his measurement method and his 4 to 6 % is not on Model X, but the order of magnitude and the inversion are the same at a second owner's. One point deserves correcting, because I expected the opposite result. The 2016 was a 60D, a 75 kWh pack limited in software to 60, as Tesla announced on July 13, 2016. It therefore ran for twenty-two months at 80 % of its real capacity. I checked whether that period had protected it. Delivered January 11, 2017 and unlocked November 22, 2018 at 67,300 km, it lost 3.9 % while limited, about 2.1 % a year, then 5.7 % over the following five years, about 1.1 % a year. Degradation was twice as fast during the limited period, which matches the ordinary battery curve, steep at first and flatter later. The data does not support a protective effect. I draw no causal conclusion from two owners, displayed range is not laboratory state of health, and the 2016 values at two years and nine months are extrapolated from the November 22, 2018 reading. The observation still seems worth putting on the table, because none of the large published studies breaks its results down by charge rate, chemistry or climate. That is why I am looking for comparable cases. If you owned an older generation of a model and you now drive the recent version of that same model, Model X, Model S, Leaf, Bolt or another, I would like to hear from you: both your loss figures and both your odometer readings. Sources: AVILOO, September 2, 2026 · Tesla, July 13, 2016 · Automobile Propre. I post this kind of analysis a few times a week: https://lnkd.in/grXCqAH2

automobile-propre.com logoautomobile-propre.com

Engineers & Planners in Kampala - Flood Risk Priorities 2026

🌧️ KAMPALA AND THE FLOODS: ARE WE REALLY PREPARED FOR THE 2026 RAINS? As Uganda approaches the October–November rainfall peak, renewed warnings about potentially above-normal rainfall and possible flooding should make us pause and ask a bigger question: Why does Kampala continue to flood whenever we experience intense rainfall? Flooding is not simply a problem of "too much rain." It is also about how we plan our cities, how we manage wetlands, how we protect drainage corridors, how we dispose of waste, how we design infrastructure and how we manage stormwater. Every wetland we fill, every drainage reserve we encroach upon, every impervious surface we create and every drain we allow to become blocked changes the way water moves through the city. There are lessons we can learn from countries such as Singapore and the Netherlands, which have moved beyond simply trying to get rid of water as quickly as possible. Singapore manages stormwater from the source, along its pathway and at the point of exposure. The Netherlands has embraced the principle of "Room for the River"—recognising that sometimes the safest approach is to give water space. Perhaps Kampala needs to adopt a similar philosophy: Capture it. Slow it. Store it. Convey it safely. Give it space. We need a combination of: ✅ Better drainage infrastructure ✅ Wetland protection and restoration ✅ Protection of drainage reserves ✅ Stormwater detention in major developments ✅ Improved solid waste management ✅ Better urban planning and enforcement ✅ Flood forecasting and early-warning systems ✅ Catchment-based water management Floods may be natural, but the extent of damage they cause is often influenced by human decisions. I have written a short article exploring what causes flooding, why Kampala remains vulnerable, what other countries are doing differently, and what Uganda could do to build greater flood resilience. 👉 I would particularly like to hear from engineers, planners, environmentalists, policymakers, developers and residents of Kampala: What should be our first priority in reducing Kampala's flood risk? #FloodManagement #Kampala #Uganda #ClimateResilience #UrbanPlanning #StormwaterManagement #Wetlands #WaterManagement #ClimateChange #DisasterRiskReduction #SustainableCities #WASH

Forest Officers & Restoration Ecologists in India - Why Saplings Fail

Looking to speak to the right people for a story! Here's something most of us have done at least once: planted a sapling. At a school function, an office drive, a weekend morning. We water it, take a photo, feel a little better about the world. 🌱 But how many of those saplings ever become a forest? 🪾🌳 That's the question behind a story I'm reporting for The Better India. A new CAG audit of the Green India Mission — the country's decade-long plan to grow its forests back — found that against a target of 1.4 million hectares, barely 34,000 grew. Under 3%. The reasons are more interesting than a headline: funding promised but never fully delivered, trees planted in the easy spots instead of the ones that needed them, drives that ended the moment the photo was taken. But here's what I'm most interested in — because somewhere in India, it is working. There are villages, forest officers, and communities who've grown forests that actually survived, and I want to understand what they're doing differently, and what the rest of us can learn from it. I want to write this for an ordinary reader — no policy jargon, just an honest look at what happens to the trees we plant, and what it really takes to grow a forest that lasts. So I'd love to speak with people who work on the ground: • Restoration ecologists and foresters who can explain what turns a sapling into a forest • Forest officers, current or former, who've seen what works and what doesn't • Communities, NGOs, or villages who've grown forests that lasted and know why Three questions guide the piece: 1. What actually happens to the trees we plant — and why do so few become forest? 2. What's the difference between a plantation and a living forest, and why does it matter to our water, our heat, our monsoon? 3. Where in India is it being done right and what can we learn from the people getting it right? If that sounds like you, or someone you know, please email me at [email redacted]. I'd love to talk. 🍀 The Better India #GreenIndiaMission #Conservation #SolutionsJournalism #Forests #ClimateIndia

thebetterindia.com logothebetterindia.com

Changemakers in Ulaanbaatar - Land Restoration & AgTech Podcast

I’m on my way to Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, to participate in the UNCCD COP17. Beyond the formal negotiations, side events, and policy conversations, I’m especially interested in the people turning ideas into action. I’m currently looking to identify extraordinary practitioners, innovators, community leaders, scientists, entrepreneurs, policymakers, Indigenous knowledge holders, and young changemakers who are doing remarkable work on the ground and feature their stories in my new podcast series. I’m particularly interested in people working at the intersection of technology, agriculture, land restoration, climate action, food systems, entrepreneurship, and social impact. I want to hear not only about their successes, but also about the challenges they have faced, the lessons they have learned, and the unconventional ideas that are shaping their work. As someone representing the Global South and working at the intersection of technology, agriculture, climate action, and social impact, I’m keen to bring more grassroots and often underrepresented perspectives into intergenerational conversations. So, here’s my open invitation: Who is the one person at COP17 I absolutely should meet? If you know someone with an extraordinary story, a bold idea, or meaningful work that deserves a wider audience, please DM me or introduce us directly. Sometimes, the most important conversations at a global conference happen outside the main stage. I’m looking forward to discovering those conversations in Ulaanbaatar. 🇲🇳🌱 #UNCCD #COP17 #Mongolia #Ulaanbaatar #LandRestoration #ClimateAction #YouthLeadership #GlobalSouth #Agriculture #AgTech #SocialImpact #Ecopreneurship #Innovation #Podcast #Drought #Desertification #Media #Impact

Global Voices & Youth Leaders - Podcast On Identity & Leadership

Meet the guests joining me at The Global Seat. 🌍 Over the past few months, I've had the privilege of sitting down with people from different countries, industries and lived experiences to have conversations about the issues and experiences shaping our world. Across our first episodes, we'll explore topics including identity and belonging, leadership, climate and social impact, careers, technology, culture and more. What has made this project particularly meaningful is the opportunity to learn from people whose experiences are different from my own, and to create a space where those perspectives can be shared with a wider audience. A huge thank you to each of these guests for taking a seat and trusting me with their stories. I'm so excited for you to meet them. And this is only the beginning. I'll be reaching out to more people here over the coming weeks. If you see The Global Seat and think you'd have something to bring to the conversation, I'd love to hear from you, so please feel free to get in touch. The Global Seat - conversations that bring different perspectives to the table. Which conversation are you most looking forward to? 🎙️ Episode 1 is out now, featuring Elise O'Shea on burnout, personal growth and building a purposeful life. YouTube: https://lnkd.in/eGs9AFq6 Spotify: https://lnkd.in/es4mcXCV Elise O'Shea , Leilani Faaiuaso , Sophie Handford , Enock Nkulanga , Ananya Talwar , Anjum Rahman , Camilla Di Mattei , Adriana Bird , Blake Harkness , Mohammad Sohaib Saleem , LeadMinds Africa , Harkness AI , Trimline Polymers , Ministry for the Environment | Manatū mō te Taiao , Deloitte , Tāhono Trust #TheGlobalSeat #GlobalVoices #YouthLeadership #ConversationsThatMatter #Podcast

Homeowners 2024-26 - Home Electrification Experience

Ev charger/heat pump, home battery, solar or electrical panel purchases in last 2-3 yrs. What was experience? Hi everyone, I’m writing a piece for a personal blog I do on climate tech. I’m trying to understand what it actually takes to electrify your home in 2026. I’ve read some industry reports. But I’d really like to hear from people who have actually gone through the process. If you’ve installed an EV charger, heat pump, home battery, solar, or even upgraded your electrical panel in the last 2–3 years, I’d love to hear about your experience — from deciding to do it, to installation, to what happens afterward when maintenance or other issues come up. Has the actual experience matched what you expected? If you have 10 minutes to chat, amazing. Or feel free to answer any of the questions below that feel relevant: What did you install? Why did you decide to make the change? How did you decide what company/product to go with? How many companies or quotes did you look at? How did you first find or reach out to the installer/company? What was the quoting/onboarding process like? What factors ultimately drove your decision? Did you finance it or use any rebates/credits? Were there any surprise costs? What was installation actually like? How easily did it fit into your existing home setup? Did it deliver what you expected? What has maintenance been like since? Does it need regular servicing? A little about me: my background is in helping climate tech companies scale, and I’ve set myself a 90-day challenge of writing every day, so I’m hoping to turn this around pretty quickly. I won’t name or quote anyone without checking with you first. Really appreciate any input — thank you!

Expats Living in Norway - Social Life & Cost of Living Experiences

Are you an expat living in Norway? I’d like to hear about your experiences. I’m a Norwegian journalist writing for one of Norway’s major national newspapers. I’m working on an article about how people who have moved to Norway from abroad experience life here. A recent international survey of expats found that Norway ranked poorly on several aspects of expat life, including job satisfaction, social life and cultural activities. I’m interested in hearing from people who are actually living here: Does this reflect your experience of Norway? What do you enjoy about living in Norway, and what do you find difficult, disappointing or different from what you expected? If you’re an expat living in or have left Norway and would be interested in sharing your experience, please send me a message. Here’s an excerpt from the recent study from InterNations: Norway Is the World’s Loneliest Last Place At the other end of the ranking, Norway finishes 31st out of 31 destinations in 2026. Expats there are the unhappiest in the survey: fewer than half (46%) are content with their life abroad (vs. 70% globally). The Ease of Settling In Index isn’t just in last place—every single subcategory and rating factor within it ranks 31st. Almost three-quarters of expats say making local friends is hard (vs. 40% globally), only a quarter are happy with their social life (vs. 54%), and just 31% feel at home in Norway (vs. 61%). It’s telling that around half describe their friends as mostly other expats (vs. 37% globally). At the other end of the ranking, Norway finishes 31st out of 31 destinations in 2026. Money is the other sore point (30th for Personal Finance). Norway has the worst-rated cost of living worldwide, and just 39% of expats are satisfied with their financial situation (vs. 55% globally). Many saw it coming: the high cost of living was a top concern before moving for 41% (vs. 21% globally), along with the language barrier (44% vs. 32%) and the climate (38% vs. 15%). Even the Quality of Life Index (30th) offers little relief. Norway ranks last for Leisure Options, including both the culinary variety and dining options and culture and nightlife. Working Abroad (27th) rounds out the picture, with last-place results for personal career opportunities, fair pay, and overall job satisfaction—although job security (4th) and the state of the economy (8th) are bright spots. So is nature: 96% of expats love the natural environment (6th), and the air quality (5th) is excellent. It just doesn’t seem to be enough.

Never Miss a Climate Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Climate journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.