Education Journo Requests

Connect with journalists covering education. From breaking news to in-depth features, discover relevant media opportunities from top publications in this category.

Never Miss a Education Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Education journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.

UK HE Staff with Disabilities or Neurodivergence for Podcast Interviews

🚨 New disability resource and opportunity for UK HE professionals (HEnabled) 🚨 Happy International Day of Persons with Disabilities everyone! Yesterday, I had the pleasure to sit down with Fiona Bicket for an introductory virtual coffee. It was a deeply insightful discussion which covered everything from our roles in higher education, to the challenges facing the sector as a whole and what we can do about them.I have learned so much about what Fiona does as a coach and mentor to HE professional services staff, specifically those in managerial positions and prospective managers. Please check out her profile if you are interested in finding out more! As part of this chat, Fiona has been kind enough give me the opportunity to share HEnabled with her network. Here's what you need to know: HEnabled showcases the lived experience of disabled and neurodivergent people, as well as those with long-term health conditions in the UK Higher Education system. There is a new episode every Sunday, with a different guest each week talking about their experiences as a disabled person in the sector. The show has been running for over a year and has 30 episodes to date. To the best of my knowledge, HEnabled is the first independent podcast to share the lived experiences of disabled people in UK higher education, regardless of their university or the nature of their condition(s). This makes it an incredible resource for HE providers, policymakers, and disabled students themselves. We can hear what needs to be improved in the HE sector directly from the people in it, while providing them a platform to show others that they are not alone. While the vast majority of my interviewees to date have been university students, I am looking to interview anyone involved in HE as professional services staff, support staff, academics, researchers, etc. If you are part of UK higher education I want to hear from you. If you are also able to share this show around your own networks, I would be deeply appreciative. HEnabled is not currently income generating but it takes a lot of energy to produce–the more eyes that I can get on it, the sooner that I hope to change that. If you want to find out more you can listen to the show on Spotify here: https://lnkd.in/dfzc383R Links to other streaming platforms and social media channels can be found via the Linktree link here: https://linktr.ee/henabled I hope that you find the show enjoyable and would love to hear from you via Linkedin or email ([email redacted]) if you would be interested in coming on the show. Thanks for taking the time to read this :) ID: The HEnabled logo. It has the text 'HEnabled.' in white text on a teal background.

Education Experts to Review Arguments on Credential Value-AI Impact

The problem with current education (poke holes, please) I'm not sure if this is the right place to post it. Feel free to correct me and point me towards the relevant sub. I'm working on a piece about education, and I want to stress-test the argument before I publish. So here's what I've found so far. Tell me where I'm wrong, where the logic breaks down, or what I'm missing entirely. Starting Point: What Education Actually Does I started by looking at the history of education systems, and across time and place, they've served some combination of three purposes: Foundational literacy: teaching people to read, reason, do basic math, understand how society works Workforce readiness: turning students into disciplined, employable adults Specialization: enabling deep expertise that drives innovation Different countries emphasize different combinations. The US cranks out PhDs and billion-dollar companies but imports much of its workforce. Finland focuses on making sure no one falls through the cracks. High baseline competence, fewer hypercompetitive innovators. But here's what almost every system misses: the meta-skills. Learning how to learn. Learning how to think. Critical reasoning. Self-direction. Philosophy. Agency. Schools became almost like factories optimized for producing workers and specialists. But the foundation, the ability to think clearly and teach yourself anything, got buried under standardized tests and credential chasing. Then the Internet Showed Up (And Now AI) YouTube videos. Online courses. Coaching programs. Suddenly, all those meta skills and domain expertise weren't locked behind university gates. You could learn graphic design, programming, marketing, or philosophy from your bedroom. Some of it was gold. Some of it was grifters selling get-rich-quick schemes. Then AI arrived and made it all instantaneous and free. Now anyone with internet access can get personalized tutoring in virtually any subject. This matters most for people who see education as their ticket out of poverty. A kid in rural India doesn't care about meta-skills or innovation (even if that’s what they really need). They want a way to make money. The decentralized free market of education gives them that option that didn't exist ten years ago. But what about universities and degree? The Signal Is Changing (Maybe?) Degrees were never valuable in themselves. They were signals. A degree told employers, "This person completed basic requirements and passed standardized tests. They're probably competent enough to hire." But that signal is weakening, or at least, that's my read. Companies are shifting to project-based hiring. They want to see what you've built, shipped, and solved in the real world. Degrees are no longer the only gatekeeper between you and someone willing to pay for your skills. This doesn't apply everywhere. You still need formal credentials to be a doctor, lawyer, or research scientist. We're not letting people do open-heart surgery because they watched YouTube videos. And yes, the decentralized education market has problems. No structure. No clear progression. You can learn scattered, incomplete fragments instead of building knowledge systematically, which is exactly what traditional schools still do well. Here's What I'm Actually Saying (And Where You Can Disagree) I'm not telling you to drop out and learn everything from the internet. That would be stupid for most people. What I am saying is we're watching the gatekeeping power of traditional credentials erode in real time. More companies care about what you can do than where you studied. The internet and AI have made expertise accessible to anyone willing to pursue it. The old path still works, but it's no longer the only path. My working thesis: We're living through a fundamental restructuring of how society distributes knowledge and opportunity. Some of our core institutions, like schools, universities, economic practices, and relationship constructs, are being rebuilt whether we like it or not. But here's where I might be wrong: Is the "decentralized education market" just a privileged take that ignores how most people actually learn? Does the lack of structure in online education make it fundamentally worse or just different? I want this piece to be intellectually honest, not just another "school is dead" hot take. So where does this argument fall apart? What am I not seeing?

DOE Employees Needed for NYT Shutdown Partisan Email Story

On Wednesday, the first day of the US government shutdown, employees at the Department of Education (DOE) set their automatic out-of-office email responses to inform recipients that they would be unable to respond until after the shutdown. Hours later, many DOE employees realized their response message had been altered to contain partisan language without their consent. The automatic reply now blamed Senate Democrats for the entire shutdown. It’s not clear who made the change to email accounts, which was first posted about on Bluesky by journalist Marisa Kabas. “It’s disturbing,” says a DOE employee who asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to speak to the press. Some employees changed their responses back to the more neutral language, only to have it changed yet again to the partisan response, multiple sources tell WIRED. As government employees began to log off in preparation for a shutdown, many agencies sent out guidance, including suggested language for their out-of-office message. While some agencies offered employees neutral language, simply explaining they would not be able to reply until the shutdown concluded, employees at the Small Business Administration and, according to sources and screenshots reviewed by WIRED, the Department of Labor, received suggested language that blamed Democrats for the shutdown. At the DOE, human resources sent employees standard language ahead of the shutdown, and many employees used this as their OOO text. Originally, the suggested language given to DOE employees read, “Thank you for your email. There is a temporary shutdown of the US government due to a lapse in appropriations. I will respond to your message as soon as possible after the temporary shutdown ends. Please visit Ed.gov for the latest information on the Department’s operational status.” Many employees set this neutral language as their OOO status. The new, changed message reads: “Thank you for contacting me. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed HR 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of HR 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations I am currently in furlough status. I will respond to emails once government functions resume.” “The Department unilaterally, and without staff knowledge or consent, went in and changed the messages to include partisan language,” claims another DOE employee, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity. This is particularly problematic, because experts have alleged that the partisan language could be a violation of the Hatch Act, which sets limits to the kinds of political activity government employees can engage in. Violating the Hatch Act, which is not subject to a statute of limitations, could cause a federal employee to face fines or lose their job entirely. “I've never heard of any US government at the federal level or the state or local level requiring employees to use partisan language in their communication with the public,” says Don Moynihan, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan. “Beyond the legality, this feels incredibly coercive and invasive. We hire these public servants who are supposed to serve everyone.” In response to a request for comment from WIRED, the Department of Education’s press line returned the same OOO message that was forced on employee’s email responses: “Thank you for contacting the press team. On September 19, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5371, a clean continuing resolution. Unfortunately, Democrat Senators are blocking passage of H.R. 5371 in the Senate which has led to a lapse in appropriations. Due to the lapse in appropriations, we are currently in furlough status. We will respond to emails once government functions resume.”

wired.com logowired.com

Never Miss a Education Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Education journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.