Market Intelligence Tools Journo Requests

Discover current journo requests from Market Intelligence Tools journalists and editors. Connect with media professionals seeking expert sources and commentary.

Visit marketintelligencetools.com →

Never Miss a Market Intelligence Tools Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Market Intelligence Tools journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.

Recent Market Intelligence Tools Journo Requests

Amplemarket Growth & Elite Customers - Pricing Credits & Duo Copilot

Amplemarket wants to replace your SDR stack with one AI copilot. Here's what a handful of users, reviewers, and industry personalities had to say about that I publish tool reviews on marketintelligencetools.com, and I just finished a long one on Amplemarket, which is a conflict when I'm the one asking for real opinions on it. I want to hear from people who've run real pipeline through it, especially anyone who came from Apollo, Outreach or Salesloft and can compare the switch directly. Amplemarket bundles a 200-million-contact database, outreach across seven channels and an AI copilot called Duo into one contract. The Startup plan is $600 a month for two seats, billed annually, with no monthly option and no published free trial anywhere on the site. Fifteen thousand email credits and 480 phone credits per user come with it, plus two mailboxes. Growth and Elite are both custom quotes, & neither publishes a number. Vendr's tracked-contract data puts the real median at $16,608 a year, ranging from $11,678 to $35,946. That's two to five times the advertised Startup rate, once a team needs the tiers Amplemarket won't price in public. Has anyone here signed a Growth or Elite contract? I'd like to know if the number landed near that $16,608 median, or somewhere past the $35,946 high end Vendr has on record. https://preview.redd.it/p0xzw646gxnh1.png?width=2400&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d148659bd39779f86d253cc6ad019939fb54b6e I pulled G2's own listing directly before posting this to make sure I get this right. Its aggregate is 4.6 out of 5 across 662 reviews as of 26 August 2026, with a 9.3-out-of-10 score for Quality of Support. Capterra's live listing matches on the headline number: 4.6 out of 5 across 7 reviews, 5.0 on customer service. Ease of use is the most-repeated praise on G2, cited in 149 reviews. Doug M., a small-business user, wrote: "I use amplemarket for outreach and finding leads. Its easy to use and has some great features like Duo Copilot." César P., a mid-market user, called it "the perfect fit for us" with "very effective and reliable client support." Eduardo P. said it "brings the entire outbound workflow into one place and automates a lot of the repetitive, manual work." The complaints cluster somewhere else. Gloriana Z. wrote on G2 in May 2026 that "the credit expense can easily go high when you enroll contacts in a sequence," and that a team has to spread credits through the month "so you don't run short." Luciano E., a sales executive who switched from Apollo.io, rated Amplemarket 3 out of 5 on Capterra in August 2024 and gave a blunt reason: "Bad data quality, cannot rely on the database." Rob L., a key account manager, wrote in March 2024 that "domain health went down after using, you have to keep a close eye on that," a deliverability complaint worth tracking against your own sender reputation before scaling volume. If you've hit the credit-burn problem Gloriana describes, or the data-accuracy gap Luciano flagged, I want to hear how it played out for your team. Did support fix it, or did the issue stick around? https://preview.redd.it/ac8gatc4gxnh1.png?width=2400&format=png&auto=webp&s=9703a523d13d83d9a5f5901127f59bc4a93e3b9b A few structural things are worth knowing before a demo call. Every plan bills annually with no downgrade path once signed, so a slow quarter doesn't reduce the bill the way a monthly tool would. Elite carries a 10-user floor before single sign-on or a dedicated success manager unlock, and nobody publishes what a credit top-up costs once a team burns through its annual allotment early. Amplemarket's own case studies name real customers: Deel grew revenue 20 times over twelve months after adopting it in 2020, Agilyx reports saving $100,000 a year on sales operations, and Momentum says it quadrupled its customer base in a year. Those are vendor-published outcomes from customers who agreed to be named. Vendors pick their strongest results for a case study, so read the 20x, the $100,000 and the 4x as the ceiling Amplemarket can point to today. Amplemarket's own marketing leans on an AI-does-the-work pitch. That pitch sits inside a live, running debate across sales Twitter and LinkedIn, with real people on each side and years of back-and-forth behind it. Jason Lemkin, founder of SaaStr, wrote on SaaStr.com on 1 January 2026, days ago, that his own company replaced most of its go-to-market team with AI agents and got "the same revenue with 1.2 humans instead of 10." He predicts classic email-based SDRs "will be 90% displaced within 12 months." Kyle Coleman, Global VP of Sales & Marketing at ClickUp, posted the opposite lesson in 2024, to 1,165 reactions and 192 comments on LinkedIn, after talking to four CROs in the same week. "The receipts are starting to come in from AI SDRs," he wrote. "They are not pretty." Teams, he said, "picked the low hanging fruit, and burned down the orchard." His close: "There is no easy button, there is no silver bullet." Two years separate those posts, giving Coleman's caution time to either age well or age out before Lemkin's claim showed up. https://preview.redd.it/947lcq45gxnh1.png?width=2400&format=png&auto=webp&s=d446f6e9b2add0801665a645ab915f1b164563ea Amplemarket's own review base runs from 2019 through 2026, so it's a real way to check if Coleman's 2024 caution held up. So far it sits closer to Coleman's read than Lemkin's. Duo Copilot draws real praise for automation and lead generation, 121 and 111 mentions on G2. But "missing features" and integration gaps still pull 56 and 25 mentions, and multiple reviewers describe a real learning curve before a new hire runs sequences alone. Nobody in the review base describes replacing 8 or 9 reps the way Lemkin's SaaStr post claims. The closest match is Ashley M.'s 2019 Capterra review, where the AI freed a founder to check her inbox two or three times a day. The role stayed. Only the workload changed. Which side matches what you've seen at your own company, Lemkin's days-old extinction timeline or Coleman's two-year-old burned orchard? And if you've run Duo Copilot specifically, did it act as a real copilot next to a human rep, or did it try to run the sequence alone? For anyone weighing the switch: Outreach and Salesloft price in four figures a month on custom quotes. Apollo, Reply.io and Clay run roughly $49 to $150 a seat. SalesRobot starts at $59 with no annual contract at all. Amplemarket sits priced above the mid-market tools and below the enterprise-only ones, betting the bundle is worth the gap. Questions, all in one place: Have you signed a Growth or Elite contract, and did the price land near Vendr's $16,608 median or past its $35,946 high end? Did support fix the credit-burn or data-accuracy problems Gloriana and Luciano described, or did the issue stick around? Which side matches what you've seen at your own company, Lemkin's days-old extinction timeline or Coleman's two-year-old burned orchard? If you've run Duo Copilot, did it act as a real copilot next to a human rep, or did it try to run the sequence alone? Full review, including every pricing tier, the Vendr-tracked contract range and the complete G2/Capterra breakdown, is linked below. The affiliate link on that page is for Amplemarket itself. https://marketintelligencetools.com/reports/amplemarket-pricing/ https://marketintelligencetools.com/reviews/amplemarket/ Sourcing: G2's own listing (g2.com/products/amplemarket/reviews, fetched live: 4.6/5 across 662 reviews, date\_modified 2026-08-26) and its pros-and-cons breakdown, also fetched live. Capterra's own listing (capterra.com/p/189573/Amplemarket/reviews/, fetched live: 4.6/5 across 7 reviews, last updated 20 Aug 2026). Vendr's tracked Amplemarket contract data, as cited on the site's own pricing report. Jason Lemkin, "Jason + Lenny are Back!! The Real Future of AI in Sales," saastr.com, published 1 January 2026. Kyle Coleman, LinkedIn post (linkedin.com/posts/kyletcoleman\_sales-sdr-gtmai-activity-7232069327363997696-3fti), live as of this check, 1,165 reactions and 192 comments. First posted on 21 Aug 2024. Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I'm just getting started testing a few affiliate links, low-key enough that they don't change what you see or how a page reads. No money from them yet, though that could change. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com

Vendors & Buyers - G2 Moderation - Reward Payouts - Capterra Merger

Is G2 legit? It rejected a third of Q1 2026 submissions as fraud, but scores 2.8/5 on its own reviews. I publish research on marketintelligencetools.com, and I've recently finished a deep read on G2's own Q1 2026 moderation numbers. G2 grades the software you buy, but few scrutinize G2 the same way, so I tried. If you've ever pulled up a G2 category page to shortlist a tool before a demo call, you already trust this platform more than you've probably thought about. Has a G2 star rating or badge ever swung a purchase decision for you, or does it just narrow the list before the real evaluation starts? Start with what makes G2 look rigorous. Of 244,078 review submissions in Q1 2026, it approved 154,625 (63.3%) and rejected 89,453. Of that rejected batch, 31,014 were flagged as fake outright: 18,735 identity failures (no LinkedIn, business email, or screenshot) against 12,279 incentive-abuse cases. G2 says it checks every submission against 43 data points, runs automated fraud detection, and backs it with human review from a Trust & Safety team. It joined the Coalition for Trusted Reviews on 23 October 2025, alongside Amazon, Trustpilot, Booking.com, Tripadvisor, Glassdoor, and the Better Business Bureau. https://preview.redd.it/c2gonxgomwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=f397910d7d6c0726ce30360a0f846fb11b89af59 If you've ever managed a vendor's G2 profile, did a review of yours ever get held up or rejected, and did the stated reason match what happened? Now the other side. G2 itself carries a 2.8 out of 5 rating on Trustpilot across 4,927 reviews, on the same peer-review model it sells to every company on its platform. One reviewer, Hayden Smith, wrote on 14 October 2025: "This company baits you into writing a review by offering gift cards. After spending time and effort submitting a review etc they will say no gift cards are available." G2's public reply said it couldn't locate an account under that username and asked for the email tied to it; it never addressed the reward itself. G2's reward program caps at $100 a review, and two independent trackers of the program, Score My Reviews and Team4 Agency, report the actual payout usually runs closer to a $10 gift card. If a vendor has ever emailed you asking for a G2 review in exchange for one, did it show up, and did it match what you were promised? Another reviewer, Sally, described support this way on 26 September 2025: "Trying to get hold of a real person is next to impossible if you are a paying customer. Support cancels tickets without any response or assistance." https://preview.redd.it/161ivwgomwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa6811f45580b64550e2b3b899855c8a59cc17be On LinkedIn, the argument gets more pointed. Victoria Dalleau, who says she's building the platform Hyperline, asked outright if G2 is a big scam, pointing to reviews mostly coming from customers a vendor specifically solicited, sometimes with a reward attached. Benoit Decoene, in AI business development at element61, argued the opposite: that G2's screenshot verification and named references make a review more trustworthy than a testimonial on a sales slide. Which side of that do you land on, and has your own experience with G2 pushed you one way or the other? Then there's the part most buyers don't know yet. On 5 February 2026, G2 closed a $110.0 million purchase of Capterra, Software Advice, and GetApp from Gartner. If part of your due-diligence process has ever been "check the G2 score, then cross-check it against Capterra," you've been checking two listings under one owner since that date. Neither Capterra's nor GetApp's guidelines have been updated to tie their verification standard to G2's 43-point system six months later. Did you know these were the same company now, and does that change how you'd use either one? https://preview.redd.it/dhi2nwgomwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=74a452907042304f1fdfe4d4ea46ea2d4791d682 There's a size angle too. G2's own Enterprise tier, where the deeper analytics and buyer-intent tools live, runs a median contract of roughly $28,000 a year per Vendr's tracked data, pricing out a lot of the early-stage vendors most dependent on review visibility in the first place. One more data point worth checking: the FTC's rule on manipulated reviews, finalized in August 2024, has already been used once, against a competing aggregator, Sitejabber, in November 2024. That case involved ratings collected at checkout before a customer had used the product; one retailer's 83,154-review profile there fell from a 4.72-star average to 2.19 once those were excluded. No FTC action against G2 appears in the same enforcement record. Does that read as G2 running a cleaner operation, or just one the FTC hasn't gotten to yet? So, is G2 legit? Its own numbers show a business actively fighting a real fraud problem, over a third of everything submitted in Q1 2026 never went live, while also carrying a 2.8-out-of-5 rating on the same kind of review it sells, with a reward program some reviewers say doesn't pay what it promises. Both of those are true about G2 at the same time, and reading the rating without the second half of that picture misses most of what's useful in it. What did you see? I'd like to hear from three groups specifically: buyers who've used a G2 score to make or kill a purchase decision, vendors who've managed a G2 profile and dealt with its moderation or reward program directly, anyone who's compared a G2 rating against Capterra, GetApp, or Trustpilot for the same tool and gotten a different read from each. Full report, including the vendor pricing tiers, the AI-review policy, and the complete source list, is linked below. This one carries no affiliate link; it's a straight research piece, and the site takes no payment to write about G2. https://marketintelligencetools.com/reports/is-g2-legit/ Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com

Sales Reps Using SeamlessAI & ZoomInfo - Real-World Comparisons

Seamless.AI vs ZoomInfo: a detailed, honest comparison. What's better, and at what? I publish tool reviews and comparisons on marketintelligencetools.com, and I just finished a long head-to-head on SeamlessAI and ZoomInfo, which is a conflict when I'm the one asking people to weigh in on it. I want real experience on both sides here, not marketing pages, since both vendors' own comparison pages disagree with each other on basic facts. Scope is the first difference between them. SeamlessAI is a real-time contact search engine built around one job: pull a verified email and phone number the moment a rep needs one. ZoomInfo calls itself an AI go-to-market platform, with contact data as one layer inside intent scoring, conversation intelligence and workflow automation. For anyone who's run both, did that scope difference match how your team used them, or did one end up doing the other's job anyway? Free plans split the same way. SeamlessAI gives one user 50 credits with no credit card; ZoomInfo Lite grants 10 reveal credits at signup, with a 365-day re-export window on records already pulled. Neither runs a real sales process at that volume, but fifty one-time credits and ten are different bets on how fast a team decides to pay. Paid pricing is unpublished on both sides. ZoomInfo's median contract on Vendr is $33,500 a year across 1,012 tracked deals, and SeamlessAI carries no Vendr listing at all to check a quote against. https://preview.redd.it/l4xqmswuhwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9b14bd8c068d445b9b1bd604f19be51b6148817 Data accuracy gets messy on both vendors' own domains. SeamlessAI claims "90% accurate" backed by a 10-step real-time verification check; ZoomInfo claims "up to 95%" from a pipeline of automated collection, partner data and more than 300 human researchers. Neither publishes a bounce rate. Database size tells the same story. SeamlessAI's product pages cite 1.3 billion contacts while its own homepage claims 1.8 billion verified emails and "2B+ leads researched." ZoomInfo does the same across three of its own pages: 500 million contacts on its data page, 420 million on its sales page, 300 million on its Copilot page, all live at once. If you've bought either, which figure did sales quote you, and did it match anything published? Both companies also run a comparison page naming the other directly, and reading them side by side turns up factual misses that should be easy to check. ZoomInfo's page, last updated 22 May 2026, describes SeamlessAI's free tier as "1,000 credits/year"; SeamlessAI's own pricing page says 50. ZoomInfo's page also cites a stale 4.2-out-of-5 G2 score for SeamlessAI; G2's own listing shows 4.4 across 5,356 reviews. Has anyone caught a vendor's own comparison page getting a competitor's numbers wrong like that, on any tool? https://preview.redd.it/7snantwuhwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=04f5d3124d8c73fcf25e1c8f50986458555e2db4 Feature by feature, the split holds up. ZoomInfo's intent data, Guided Intent, ships built into the platform and tracks 210 million IP-to-company pairings; SeamlessAI's intent layer runs through a Bombora add-on that costs extra. SeamlessAI's job-change tracking ships free on every plan, with no named ZoomInfo equivalent. ZoomInfo runs Chorus for conversation intelligence, something SeamlessAI has no answer for. On CRM integration, ZoomInfo claims 120+ native, bidirectional connectors; SeamlessAI's own integrations page lists "120+" too, but tags most of them "Powered by Zapier," with only two true native integrations, HubSpot's Breeze Agent and n8n. If native, bidirectional CRM sync matters to your workflow, did a Zapier-routed integration ever cause a real problem, or is that a difference without a practical impact? https://preview.redd.it/fyn1ntwuhwnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=4223657dd62cf46eb126f6b2cca44377838657d3 ZoomInfo carries a documented legal history SeamlessAI doesn't: a $29,557,612.50 privacy class action settlement, Ramos v. ZoomInfo Technologies, over using people's names and job details to market subscriptions without consent, approved November 2024. ZoomInfo also trades publicly on Nasdaq under the ticker GTM; SeamlessAI is private and founder-led, with no legal history or funding disclosure turning up anywhere. G2 rates them close together: 4.4 for SeamlessAI across 5,356 reviews against 4.5 for ZoomInfo across 9,384. So, a few things I'd like to hear from people who've run either or both: where has SeamlessAI won out for your team, and where did ZoomInfo's extra layers (intent, conversation intelligence, native CRM sync) turn out to be worth the five-figure jump? Did you ever run both at once, for different reps or different use cases? And for anyone who switched from one to the other, what broke the tie? Full comparison, including all 32 documented limits, the pricing breakdown and the complete source list, is linked below. The affiliate links on that page are for SeamlessAI itself and for Lusha, one of the alternatives it covers. https://marketintelligencetools.com/compare/seamless-ai-vs-zoominfo/ Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I'm just getting started testing a few affiliate links, low-key enough that they don't change what you see or how a page reads. No money from them yet, though that could change. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com

Leadfeeder Users - Identification Rates Vs Competitors

What's your opinion about Leadfeeder? I publish tool reviews on marketintelligencetools.com and just finished a long one on Leadfeeder, which is a conflict when I'm the one asking for real opinions on it. I want to hear from people who've measured their own identification rate against it, especially anyone who ran a side-by-side test against another vendor. Leadfeeder's homepage claims up to 45% of website visitors identified. Its own help center, updated 27 March 2026, won't put a number on it at all: "there is no way to honestly give a percentage of visitors identified." A Capterra reviewer who's a CMO at an IT services firm measured 2% company-level matches on her own traffic; Leadinfo, the closest rival, tells trial users to expect roughly 30%. One user ran Leadfeeder against HubSpot's Buyer Intent on the same page, with the same date range, and got zero overlap between the two company lists. https://preview.redd.it/gzzmbk9p9rnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=781153888248af7c230e213c5ca54da2a661fcd7 Pricing runs Lite free for the last 100 identified companies, Discover €79 to €309 a month billed annually, Activate €369 to €729, and Scale €599 to €2,089, all with unlimited users on every paid tier. A separate credit pool bills email enrichment at 0.2 credits, email-plus-phone at 1, and every CRM export at 1 more; credits don't roll over, and a medical-device reviewer said she lost "700+ credits" when her subscription lapsed. Annual contracts renew for 12 months unless cancelled 30 days ahead, and the tier auto-upgrades when a trailing 12 months of traffic outgrows it. A Capterra reviewer, a partner at an IT services firm, wrote that Leadfeeder doesn't send a renewal notice beforehand and is "100% strict on terms." The brand itself has changed names three times in four years: Echobot and Leadfeeder merged into Dealfront in 2022 on €180 million from Great Hill Partners, and Dealfront reverted to the Leadfeeder name on 24 March 2026. If you've run it, did your own identification rate land anywhere near 45%, closer to the 2% one reviewer measured, or somewhere in between? Has anyone missed the 30-day cancellation window on an annual plan, and did Leadfeeder enforce it the way that reviewer describes? And has the Echobot-Dealfront-Leadfeeder rebrand history changed how you weigh the company's stability? Full review, including every pricing tier, the credit system and the full identification-rate discussion, is linked below. The affiliate link on that page is for Leadfeeder itself. https://marketintelligencetools.com/reviews/leadfeeder/ Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I'm just getting started testing a few affiliate links, low-key enough that they don't change what you see or how a page reads. No money from them yet, though that could change. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com

Brand24 Users - 30-Day Data Limit & Sentiment Accuracy

What's your opinion about Brand24? I publish tool reviews on marketintelligencetools.com and just finished a long one on Brand24, which is a conflict when I'm the one asking for real opinions on it. I want to hear from people who've hit the 30-day data wall or spot-checked its sentiment tagging against their own read of a mention. Brand24 tracks 25,000,000+ sources across nine platforms, including LinkedIn, X, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and Quora, and has delivered 25 billion mentions to customers to date. Every project holds roughly the last 30 days of history and stops there, at every tier including Enterprise; the help center says it directly: "No older than 30 days, with the exception of special cases." https://preview.redd.it/dnwz37ij9rnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=b3dabbf71f68eb17095488ba447fc4f1545c4666 Sentiment analysis runs in 108 languages, and a January 2023 AI model raised accuracy from 64% to 84%, a jump the company hasn't updated since. That still leaves real misses: one G2 reviewer wrote that "sometimes sentiment analysis isn't fully accurate, especially with contextual mentions," while a Capterra reviewer said "AI summaries have become very quantitative and statistical," flattening nuance the automated tag can't catch. Five tiers run $199 to $1,499 a month billed annually, all published on the pricing page with no demo call required. Individual covers 3 keywords and 2,000 mentions; Business covers 25 keywords and 100,000 mentions; every plan from Team upward carries unlimited seats, so the keyword cap forces the upgrade, not headcount. In 2019, Facebook blocked Brand24's company accounts and its co-founder's personal profile over a data-collection dispute; the company lost 8% of its customers and laid off 12 employees before a March 2020 settlement restored access. If you've run it past the free trial, has the 84% sentiment ceiling held up on your own mentions, or did the misses cluster somewhere specific like sarcasm or industry jargon? Has the 30-day history wall ever cost you a report you needed to pull retroactively? And for anyone outside Europe, did the support-scheduling gap reviewers describe match your experience? Full review, including every pricing tier, the 2019 Facebook dispute and the sentiment-accuracy history, is linked below. The affiliate link on that page is for Brand24 itself. https://marketintelligencetools.com/reviews/brand24/ Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I'm just getting started testing a few affiliate links, low-key enough that they don't change what you see or how a page reads. No money from them yet, though that could change. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com

B2B SDRs Who Used Lusha - Phone & Email Accuracy & Garante Ruling

What's your opinion about Lusha? I publish tool reviews on marketintelligencetools.com and just finished a long one on Lusha, which is a conflict when I'm the one asking for real opinions on it. I want to hear from people who've dialed numbers or sent emails off its data. The database runs over 280 million direct dials, more than 152 million business emails and 30-plus million company profiles, all self-reported and never independently audited. Lusha claims 98% email accuracy and 86% phone accuracy on its own site; reviewers running real campaigns report 80-90% on email and 70-80% on phone once a list gets dialed at volume, and one reviewer said only half the phone numbers they pulled were correct on a follow-up call. Coverage drops sharply outside North America too. The credit system charges 1 credit for an email reveal, 1 for a company record and 5 for a phone reveal, so a phone-heavy workflow burns through a plan roughly five times faster than an email-first one. Free is $0 for 40 credits a month; Starter runs $49.90, Pro $69.90 for two seats and 600 credits, Premium $399.90 for five seats and 3,400 credits, and Scale is quote-only. Rollover only applies to Pro and Premium on monthly billing, up to twice the monthly cap; Free and Starter lose what they don't use. Ten seats on Pro cost $469.10 a month on monthly billing, since the plan includes two seats at $69.90 and each additional seat runs $49.90. Italy's data protection authority, the Garante, fined Lusha €2 million and ordered it to stop processing Italian residents' data and delete what it had collected, after finding the company assembled profiles partly by scraping social networks and buying records from other data brokers. Lusha holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27701 certifications at the same time, and users separately report slow or unaddressed removal requests. https://preview.redd.it/3p10wmmb9rnh1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=c951b93e1b09a8d28408bafd80a7982c68f8ae9f If you've run real volume through it, does the phone-reveal accuracy land closer to Lusha's stated 86% or closer to what reviewers describe? Has the credit system's 5-to-1 phone-to-email cost changed how you structure outreach? And for anyone selling into Europe, has the Italian ruling come up in a security review or a legal sign-off before a contract got signed? Full review, including every pricing tier, the credit rollover rules and the Garante ruling in full, is linked below. The affiliate link on that page is for Lusha itself. https://marketintelligencetools.com/reviews/lusha/ Disclosure: I run this site. No ads. I'm just getting started testing a few affiliate links, low-key enough that they don't change what you see or how a page reads. No money from them yet, though that could change. I do the research because I find it interesting, it's good practice for my day job, found out that I like building sites from scratch in static HTML, and figured this sub's audience would get something out of it too.

marketintelligencetools.com