Dating Journo Requests

Connect with journalists covering dating. From breaking news to in-depth features, discover relevant media opportunities from top publications in this category.

Never Miss a Dating Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Dating journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.

Austinites - Dating & Connection Documentary

Looking for Austinites for a documentary about dating and connection \Received permission from Mods for this post\] Hi r/AskAustin, I’m Ravi, an Austin filmmaker directing Jaded, a feature documentary about dating and connection in our city. I keep coming back to a question: has modern life made it easier to avoid the uncomfortable parts of getting close to someone? Through dating, friendships, and everyday life in Austin, I want to explore how technology and the convenience we’ve grown used to shape the way we connect. We currently have two subjects, and we’re looking for a few more people open to letting us follow parts of their lives over several months. Filming could include spending time with friends, getting ready for a date, and talking through how things are going. You don’t need an extraordinary dating history or experience on camera. Whether you’re enjoying dating, feeling discouraged, or taking a break, I’d be interested in hearing from you. This isn’t a dating show. We won’t arrange matches or stage situations. Participation is unpaid, and we’ll discuss what filming involves and your boundaries before you decide whether to take part. We’re also looking for established couples in their 40s, 50s and older for separate 1–2 day interviews about how they met and what they’ve been through together. If you’re interested, you can [learn more and fill out the interest survey. Filling it out doesn’t commit you to being filmed. You’re welcome to ask questions here or email [email redacted]. If someone comes to mind, please send this their way. Thanks!

Bereaved Families from Jehovah's Witness Blood Refusal - Policy Change

Jehovah's Witness Blood Policy 2026: 4 Major Changes Today, September 18, 2026, Jehovah’s Witnesses announced one of the most significant changes to their blood policy in decades. Red blood cells, white blood cells, plasma, and platelets obtained from another person are no longer categorically prohibited. Each Witness may now decide individually whether to accept them. Witnesses may also decide whether to donate blood for the purpose of providing components or fractions. Whole blood from another person remains prohibited. This follows the change announced earlier this year allowing Witnesses to make their own decision about the use of their own stored blood, including preoperative autologous donation. For AJWRB, there are several immediate issues that we believe are especially important. First, this is a significant expansion of individual conscience in medical decision-making, and we welcome that. Second, religious permission is not the same as patient consent. Clinicians can no longer assume that “Jehovah’s Witness” means refusal of red cells, plasma, platelets, or white cells. Each patient’s actual preferences need to be established individually and, whenever possible, privately. Third, many Witnesses are still carrying advance directives that were completed when these treatments were religiously prohibited. Watchtower has announced that a new medical directive is coming and has advised Witnesses that, in the meantime, they may document their current choices through legally recognized forms or directly with healthcare providers. Fourth, there is a transitional information problem. As of today, some clinician-facing information on JW.org still describes red cells, white cells, plasma, platelets, and preoperative autologous donation as refused. That information will presumably be updated, but clinicians need to be aware of the discrepancy now. And finally, we recognize that this announcement may be extremely painful for people who lost a spouse, parent, child, sibling, or friend after blood was refused under the former policy. A policy change today cannot tell us what a particular patient would have chosen under different circumstances, nor does it prove that transfusion would have prevented an individual death. But it can reopen very real grief, anger, and difficult questions. Those experiences should not be minimized. AJWRB has published an initial analysis of the change here: https://www.ajwrb.org/jehovahs-witness-blood-policy-2026-major-change We are now beginning the much larger job of reviewing and updating our website, since a great deal of material that accurately described the former policy is no longer an accurate description of current policy. We also want to preserve the historical record. If you or your family were directly affected by the blood policy, including the loss of a loved one or a serious medical experience involving blood refusal, AJWRB would like to hear from you. Those accounts can be preserved anonymously when necessary. For those who have been personally affected by this policy, particularly families who have lost someone, we recognize that today may be a very complicated day.

ajwrb.org logoajwrb.org

CIWEM Members in East Anglia - Managing Fens Study Day

What a treat to get away from my desk and into a room (and then out into a glorious nature reserve) with some of the people we make The Environment for, about and with. The CIWEM East Anglian branch and Rivers & Coastal Group were kind enough to invite me to their joint ‘Managing the Fens’ study day at WWT Welney. My head is now swimming with the fascinating history, intimidating challenges and exciting opportunities for environmental management in this region. I knew a little bit before I went in, having written about wet farming for The Environment a while back - I’m now really looking forward to diving back in with my own research as I write about the study day for our digital newsletter (watch this space). As well as having my curiousity sparked by the content of the study day (thanks to Charlotte Nunns (FCIWEM CWEM CEnv) Selena Peters, FCIWEM C.WEM MSc Annissa D. & Stephanie Horner for putting together a brilliant programme of talks), meeting some of the attendees, including plenty of CIWEM members, was a real highlight. As a person in comms in this sector, I talk a lot about the value of bringing people together, but it often feels quite abstract because I do most of my work by myself - being part of the study day yesterday made it all much more tangible. If you were there too and we didn’t manage to chat, do connect here and drop me a line. I’m already cooking up some articles for The Environment based on conversations I had yesterday, and there’s certainly scope for more.

Copywriters & Brand Voice Experts - Anti-AI Literary Counterculture

#journorequest: Seeking insights on the anti-AI literary counterculture There have been countless stories discussing AI-generated copy and all the tells that come with it over the last year or so. Em-dashes have become the most infamous punctuation point, for all the wrong reasons; the “it’s not x, it’s y” sentence structure has had editors tearing their hair out; whenever I see qualifying phrases and rhetorical devices like, “And honestly?”, “quietly becoming…”, “genuinely…”, I immediately switch off and assume (maybe unfairly) that everything preceding or after the tell has also been lazily generated by a chatbot. People have become so conscious of coming across as AI that they’re going to bizarre lengths to prove that there’s a human behind the copy. There are reported cases of people deliberately leaving typos in job applications, professionals sending emails with intentional lower-case subject lines or small grammar slip-ups, dating app users doing the same in their bios and prompts, people signing off messages with “sent from my iPhone” (even if they weren’t). If people are this acutely aware of not sounding like AI in their own communications, you can bet they’re looking out for it in all the media and comms they engage with. There’s research to back up this phenomenon: Boston Consulting Group found that 69% of surveyed bosses prefer job applications with minor mistakes to reassure them that they were written without AI, and anecdotal A/B testing has found that Fortune 500 CEOs tend to open emails with lowercase, misspelt subject lines at a far higher rate. As a writer and editor, this has been on my mind a lot of late. How do you differentiate yourself and find your voice in this current moment without over-correcting? Do people and brands now have to do extra work to prove they've actually authored a piece of work or copy? So, I’m writing a report for insights agency Canvas8 on this very topic, exploring its cultural and commercial implications. If you have branding or advertising expertise (particularly copywriters), are adept at crafting tone of voice for brands or have an interesting insight into the bizarre phenomenon of this anti-AI counter-style, let me know in the comments below or via DM. I’m looking for expert perspectives ASAP to include in my reporting. Thanks! #AI #editorial #copywriting #brandvoice #journalism #branding #toneofvoice #insights

canvas8.com logocanvas8.com

Women in Age-Gap Relationships - Younger & Older Partner Perspectives

IRTR] Seeking Women in Age-Gap Relationships — Younger Women Dating Older Men & Older Women Dating Younger Men Name of Podcast: Digital Dating Over 50 SFW How long have you been doing this?: 5 seasons and currently publishing new episodes. Website: [https://anonymousandrewpodcast.com/ \[Dating & Relationships\] - Modern dating, relationships, dating over 50, online dating, romance, intimacy, and real-life dating experiences. Approx. Length of Episodes: 45–60 minutes GUESTS I'M SEEKING: I'm planning an episode exploring age-gap relationships from women's perspectives, and I'm looking for women who fall into either of these groups: • A younger adult woman who is currently dating a significantly older man, has previously done so, or actively prefers older men. • An older woman who is currently dating a significantly younger man, has previously done so, or actively prefers younger men. This is specifically NOT about sugar dating or transactional relationships. I'm interested in genuine attraction and companionship and what draws people toward partners significantly older or younger than themselves. I'd like to explore maturity, confidence, life experience, physical attraction, emotional connection, lifestyle differences, reactions from friends and family, misconceptions about age-gap couples, and the benefits and challenges that come with these relationships. You may remain completely anonymous. No real name, location, employer, or other identifying information needs to be used on the episode. I'm looking for real, candid personal experiences rather than experts or someone looking to promote a product. If either perspective describes you and you'd be comfortable sharing your story, I'd love to hear from you.If this describes you and you'd be comfortable sharing your story, I'd love to hear from you.

anonymousandrewpodcast.com logoanonymousandrewpodcast.com

Fintech Experts in Francophone Africa - Consolidation & Regulation

Fintech Espresso #21 is out ☕ Consolidation, not creation, is African fintech's story this fortnight: capital, capability and regulation are being absorbed into fewer hands. 🟢 Ventures Platform Fundl founder Kola A. closed an oversubscribed $84M Fund II, nearly double the size of Fund I — early-stage capital is consolidating into fewer, larger allocators. [Grindstone] launched a R500M fund targeting the gap between seed and Series A, turning a funding gap into its own asset class. 🟡 Paystack folded Allawee (now part of Paystack)'s technology into its own infrastructure instead of keeping the brand — capability is being absorbed, not built from scratch. Creditchek acquired Algosystems invest to add core-banking software to its fintech layer, moving upstream into the software banks run on. 🔴 SEC Nigeria proposed rules that follow the customer, not the company — a foreign platform now enters the regulatory perimeter simply by having Nigerian users. FRA Egypt authorised four firms spanning microfinance, mortgages, funds and private-equity platforms — digital licensing now spreads across verticals instead of staying fintech-only. My take: early-stage capital keeps gathering into fewer, larger allocators. Companies increasingly buy the capability instead of building it. Regulators keep widening their perimeter instead of narrowing categories. Is your business still confined to the category you were licensed under? We are looking for experts and contributors in fintech, payments, financial inclusion and regulation across francophone Africa. Add your profile to the skills mapping: https://lnkd.in/e9E7FmY3 #FintechEspresso #AfricaFintech #DigitalFinance #FintechRegulation #PaymentInfrastructure

Denver Therapy Patients - When Therapy Hurts or Breaks Trust

Denver area Discussion about what people think your therapy is and what you might actually get. Denver-area people: Has therapy ever made things worse? Hi! I'm Carrie, and I'm starting a project called The Missing Step about something I don't think gets talked about nearly enough: what happens when therapy goes wrong? We hear a lot about going to therapy, finding a therapist, and how therapy can help. I want to hear about the other experiences too. Have you ever left therapy feeling that you were worse off than when you started? Felt misunderstood or repeatedly unheard? Had a therapist damage your trust? Had treatment go in a direction you didn't want? Had something happen that made you think, Wait—wasn't this supposed to help me? Even better if your clinician.current or former and can be honest about rupture repair, if that works and why. How and when it doesn't because there's that. I'm interested in talking with people who feel therapy harmed them and people who had a bad experience but eventually found a therapist who genuinely helped. I'd especially like to understand what went wrong—and what a better clinician did differently. I'm in the Denver area and would love to hear from other people locally, although I'm happy to talk with people elsewhere too. I'm considering developing these conversations into a podcast or interview project eventually, but talking to me does not mean agreeing to be recorded or published. Right now especially for me. It might be validating it might be helpful I don't know right now I'm by myself. That is what is more painful than anything. I've said it time and time again it doesn't make me feel better to know that other people have had the same or similar experiences but it makes me feel better because \I know I'm not alone.\ And it's unfortunately not uncommon. And I do not hear and it has been unfortunately my experience specifically within my family unit to push their pain mental health as holy and completely benign there is never any pitfalls or problems or concerns or challenges or harm. I think I would have approached any of this with more jaundiced eye had I had people warn me that things can go wrong and not push this always therapy is mental health is always a good thing and it always results in improving someone's life, and if it doesn't it must be the fault of the person participating. That's not necessarily so. If we ever wanted to take that step, we'd discuss it separately and you'd decide what you're comfortable with, including anonymity. For now, I'm interested in listening. If you have an experience you'd like to share, reply here or send me a private message. And if you've ever thought, "Everybody tells people to go to therapy, but nobody talks about what happens when therapy itself goes wrong," you're exactly the kind of person I'd like to hear from.

Singles Over 50 - Dating App Experiences & Real Dates

Are Dating Apps Failing Singles Over 50—or Are We Choosing the Wrong Ones? Every discussion about dating apps after 50 seems to end the same way. One person says, “I met my partner within two months.” Another says, “I paid for six months and never had one decent conversation.” A third person insists the same app is full of fake profiles, while someone living 30 miles away says it has been the best platform they’ve tried. How can the experiences be that different? I’m starting to wonder whether dating apps are failing people over 50—or whether many of us are simply using platforms that don’t fit our age, location, or intentions. The “Best” App May Not Exist People often ask which dating app is best for singles over 50, as if there should be one correct answer. But an app can be active in Chicago and nearly empty in a small town. One platform may attract people who want a serious relationship, while another has more casual users. A site that works well for a 55-year-old woman may feel completely different for a 67-year-old man. Location alone appears to change everything. Someone living in a large city may see hundreds of nearby profiles. Someone in a rural area may reach the end of the local results within ten minutes—and then start receiving suggestions from two states away. That doesn’t necessarily mean the second person has a bad profile. They may simply be fishing in a very small pond. What Are We Actually Paying For? The part that bothers me is how difficult it can be to judge a platform before paying. Most sites promise active members, compatible matches, better visibility, or more serious conversations. Then you subscribe and discover that many profiles haven’t been active recently, the same faces keep returning, or basic features require another upgrade. A larger number of profiles also doesn’t automatically create a better experience. I would rather see 30 active people in my age range who live nearby than scroll through 3,000 profiles belonging to people who are inactive, incompatible, or several hours away. For singles over 50, I think a useful platform should answer some very ordinary questions: Are there active members near me? Can I tell when a profile was last active? Are the photos and identities reasonably verified? Can I filter by age, distance, lifestyle, and relationship goals? Can I communicate without being pushed into constant upgrades? Is canceling a subscription straightforward? Do conversations lead to phone calls and actual dates? Those details matter far more than a polished advertisement promising endless possibilities. Maybe the Problem Isn’t Only the Platform To be fair, the app can’t do all the work. Sometimes people join, upload two old photos, write “Just ask” in the bio, and then decide the entire platform is useless when nobody responds. Others exchange messages for weeks without suggesting a call or coffee. Some use filters so narrow that only seven people qualify. A few pay for boosts when the real problem is that their profile doesn’t show enough personality. There’s also timing. An app that feels dead in January may suddenly have new members in March. You could use a platform for months without meeting anyone, then connect with the right person the week before canceling. That makes reviews difficult. A platform can provide the introduction, but it can’t create compatibility, conversation skills, emotional readiness, or effort. Still, people deserve to know what they are signing up for. I Want the Unpolished Reviews Most “best dating sites for over 50” articles sound suspiciously similar. They repeat feature lists, quote membership numbers, and somehow recommend nearly every platform. That isn’t what I want to know. I want the details people usually leave out: Did the age and distance filters actually work? Were the profiles active? How many real conversations did you have? Did paying improve anything? Was customer support helpful? Could you cancel easily? Did you ever meet someone in person? I’m considering putting together a straightforward comparison of the dating platforms used by people over 50—not based only on advertising claims, but on the issues that actually affect us. Before doing that, I’d like to hear from people who have used them. Which dating app or website did you try, and what happened? Please include your age range, general location, whether you used the free or paid version, and whether it produced any real dates. Good, bad, boring, or surprisingly successful—I want the honest version.

Non-Military Trauma Veterans - Rebuilding Lives & Storytelling

Now it’s 1:25 am, and I want to see how long it will take to pour out what’s left on my chest. This is it for me. For at least twelve years, I’m dedicating this season to my passion for telling stories. Years ago, I would blog my life away on Facebook. My private accounts are closed because, for some odd reason, I’m held to a standard I never agreed to meet anyone’s false expectations of me. Put it this way… I know trauma firsthand, and the shit is mind-blowing. Having to pick up pieces of your life to mend yourself back together, just for more pieces to shatter before even healing from the last life-altering experience. I know trauma. Then my diagnosis didn’t help. Trauma. So now instead of falling asleep from boredom on dating apps, I’m on this app to share myself. How I feel about people being more invested in me than my work. And if I’m not interesting enough, then my work is moot. I tell the men that I’m an author. Then share my new site, camilledford.com, that I absolutely love. Thanks, Charlotte. They’ll pledge to purchase Articles of Commitment: The Bylaws of Modern Romance. Then they learn about Karma. 🤣 But my job title is Editor-in-Chief. My face turns beet red when they ask what my specialty is. I explain that I’m a journalist, own a magazine, and am literally winging it as I go. Why? Because people in the industry aren’t interested in mentoring me. They’re just watching to see if I’ll fail. The men grow intrigued. Then I tell them the current site is veteranexcellemce.org. They instantly go to it. It never fails when they ask, “Are you a veteran?” Hell yeah, I’m a veteran. Just not military. I’m a veteran at experiencing and overcoming trauma. That’s not the conversation to have with perfect strangers, though. Honestly, all I know is that I wanted my own platform to write stories. I’m not into the lifestyles of the rich and famous. I’m not into trends. I can’t stand politics. There’s a population that’s underrepresented and deserves to tell their own stories instead of having them told about them. Of all the reasons I have to start the magazine, the main reason is because I want people to tell their own stories. Not the polished version. Not the version somebody else thinks is more marketable. Not the version that makes everybody else comfortable. Their story. I know what it feels like to have pieces of your life shattered and then have to figure out who you are with what’s left. I know what it feels like to rebuild and then have life come along and knock something else loose. I’m so curious about veterans. I want to know what they survived. What they built. What they lost. What they learned. What they never told anybody. I want to know what makes them get up and keep going. That’s what this season of my life is about. I’m giving myself at least twelve years to do this. To write. To publish. To ask better questions. To tell stories that deserve to be told. At 1:44 in the morning, that’s all I really know.

Never Miss a Dating Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Dating journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.