Privacy Journo Requests

Connect with journalists covering privacy. From breaking news to in-depth features, discover relevant media opportunities from top publications in this category.

Never Miss a Privacy Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Privacy journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.

Parents of Nonverbal Children - Video Recording & AI Progress Reports

My daughter can't tell me what happened at school today. Not because she doesn't want to. Because she can't - not yet. So I asked her school team a simple question: can we record her 1-on-1 sessions and use AI to share structured progress with us at home, so we can reinforce what she's learning? What I heard back was a wall. ❌ Privacy concerns. ❌ We can't force teachers to take videos. ❌ It's not in their contracts. ❌ If we do it for your child, everyone will want it. ❌ We won't collect data for you. Not one of those responses came with an alternative. No other plan for how we - the parents of a child who cannot self-report - are supposed to know what's working, what to practice at home, or whether the skills from Tuesday's session survive until Friday. This is Part 1 of a series I'm writing about innovation resistance in special education. Not to vent. To build something useful. I've already filed a formal IEP amendment request for video reporting and video self-modeling. The process has started. The next articles in this series will go beyond documenting the problem - I'll share the specific approaches, reasoning, and language that can help parents win these conversations, or avoid the battle entirely. If you're a parent, educator, or anyone who works in or around special education - I'd genuinely love to hear what you've experienced. 👇 Read Part 1 here: https://lnkd.in/eKcKc7fK #SpecialEducation #IEP #Disability #Parenting #AI

FinTech & Policy Analysts - SBA Patriot Pitch $1M Grant Bias

Is the SBA's new $1M "Patriot Pitch" grant competition a celebration of free market capitalism on Main Street? Or is it an exclusive, public-private partnership marketing funnel? 📊🇺🇸 The SBA just launched its Freedom 250 Patriot Pitch Competition, offering a massive $1 million prize pool. The grant competition is positioned as a grand nod to American free enterprise. 🏛️✨ As an economic researcher who has previously written marketing materials for the grant's sole corporate sponsor, Clover Network, Inc., I looked under the hood of the entry guidelines. 🔍 View the competition's entry eligibility & guidelines: 🔗https://lnkd.in/ew2zGiQg📄 The structure of the application process tells me a different story. 📜🤔 🛑The Gatekeeper Red Flag:To enter the $1M grant competition, small businesses must submit a comprehensive 3-year forward-looking financial model, a polished pitch deck, and a produced 60-second video—all within a brutal, two-week sprint (Deadline: June 10). The very small businesses that need non-dilutive capital the most are often the least equipped to drop their daily operations to prepare an enterprise-grade pitch package. ❌💼 🛑The "Quid Pro Quo" Testimonial:The guidelines require applicants to submit a narrative on how past SBA loans positively impacted their business. Is the requirement for private business owners to praise government loans a fair condition of entry, or does it function as a state-directed propaganda loop?🗣️🔄 🛑The #FinTech Footprint:Clover is funding the entire $1M prize pool as the SBA's exclusive sponsor. Because Clover's primary target market is the restaurant and hospitality sectors, does this alignment bake a systemic bias into what judges will choose to represent the "Best of America"? 🍽️🏪 I'm looking for expert commentary and real stories from business owners for an upcoming deep dive. 📝🎯 🎙️FinTech & Public Policy Analysts:Why did the SBA choose to partner with just *ONE* payment giant? How does a partnership like this change the competitive landscape for other payment companies? Does it suggest there might be financial issues within other payment processors that were not part of the sponsorship? 🏛️💳 💼Small Business Owners (Eligibility to Enter: 3+ Years Old, $100k+ Revenue, Past SBA Loans):Are you rushing through this complicated process to enter the competition? Or are you holding back because of the tight deadline, data privacy concerns with Box.com, or the required "sweat equity" to participate? 📦🔒 I'm sourcing for this piece via Qwoted. I'm accepting written responses and audio files (like iPhone Voice Memos) to capture your honest insights. 📱🎙️ Access my full request and submit your thoughts here:📥👇 https://lnkd.in/eyCkZDQu Thanks - I look forward to your responses! #SmallBusinessOwners #Fintech #Entrepreneurship#Grants

Tech Experts in Randburg - AI & Cybercrime & POPIA & NFC Series

🚨 SHORT CIRCUIT RADIO TECH SHOW IS CALLING TECH EXPERTS, INDUSTRY LEADERS & INNOVATORS 🚨 I’m looking for engaging studio guests to join me on *SHORT CIRCUIT* 🎙️ — *Your Tech Hour* on Urban Edge Radio. We’re recording a powerful 4-week tech series ahead of time at Solid Gold Studios and are inviting professionals, thought leaders, creators, founders, specialists, and even well-known personalities connected to these industries to join the conversation. 📍 Recording Location: Randburg 🎙️ Format: 1-hour radio show 📅 Recorded in advance | Airs Thursdays We want REAL conversations. No fluff. No confusing jargon. Just insights that matter. ## 🔹 MONTH 1 — THE MYTH OF AI **The Good, The Bad & The Ugly** Hosted by Geniene Preston — author of *AI for Small Business* and AI trainer. We’re looking for: * AI specialists * Business leaders using AI * Ethics experts * Developers * Digital futurists * Educators * Public personalities speaking about AI disruption Let’s unpack how AI changed our lives almost overnight. Over 4 shows we aim to show The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. --- ## 🔹 WEEK 2 — ONLINE SCAMS & DIGITAL FRAUD Hosted by Geniene Preston, also co-host of *The Real Scam* podcast alongside Tracey Grummet on SA Commuter Radio. We’re looking for guests knowledgeable in: * Cybercrime * Online scams * Banking fraud * Identity theft * Consumer protection * Digital safety * Ethical hacking * Scam investigations If you’ve fought scams, exposed them, researched them, or survived them — we want your voice. --- ## 🔹 WEEK 3 — POPIA, EMAIL MARKETING & DATA PRIVACY Hosted by Geniene Preston, CEO of Sell While you Sleep incorporating Whatsapp CRM, Mail and Anytime Apps. Topics include: * POPIA compliance * GDPR comparisons * Email marketing laws * Data privacy * CRM systems * Consent & databases * International communication regulations Looking for: * Legal experts * Compliance officers * Digital marketers * CRM specialists * Privacy advocates * Corporate communication experts --- ## 🔹 WEEK 4 — NFC TECHNOLOGY & THE FUTURE OF SMART CONNECTIONS Hosted by Geniene Preston, founder of the Emergency Button Scanme To SaveMe. We’ll explore the fascinating and sometimes misunderstood world of NFC technology. Seeking guests involved in: * NFC innovation * Smart devices * Wearable tech * Emergency tech * Contactless systems * IoT * Smart business cards * Tech startups --- 🎧 If you’d like to be featured, recommend a guest, or collaborate, drop a comment or send me a DM. Let’s decode tech together on *SHORT CIRCUIT*. 🚀 #ShortCircuit #UrbanEdgeRadio #AI #CyberSecurity #POPIA #NFC #TechTalk #Innovation #DigitalMarketing #DataPrivacy #PodcastGuest #RadioShow #Johannesburg #SouthAfrica #ArtificialIntelligence #TechExperts

DHS Employees in Vermont - Immigration Enforcement & Policy Reporting

Do You Work for the Department of Homeland Security in Vermont? Seven Days wants to Hear From You. I’m Lucy Tompkins, the immigration reporter at Seven Days. If you have worked for Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Citizenship and Immigration Services or other agencies under the DHS umbrella in Vermont, then I’d like to hear from you. You don’t need to have a specific complaint or allegation to reach out. Even if you’re not sure what you want to share, you’re welcome to get in touch for an off-the-record conversation or to ask questions about how I handle sources. I'm working on ongoing reporting about immigration enforcement and policy in Vermont. I understand you may be taking a risk in contacting me, and I take your privacy extremely seriously. We won’t publish your name or any information you share without your permission. To get in touch, you can send an email [email redacted]. If you’d rather talk on Signal, an encrypted messaging app, you can call or send a message to lucytompkins.55. Signal offers end-to-end encryption for sharing text, photos, videos and calls. It is available on mobile and desktop. You can alsoset messages to disappearfrom your phone after a certain length of time. Be aware that sending things from a work computer or email account or while connected to work Wi-Fi networks may create added risks because many corporate and government accounts log web traffic.

sevendaysvt.com logosevendaysvt.com

California Domestic Violence & Housing Providers - Funding Cuts Impact

✅ Work in the domestic violence or housing space? ✅ Provide services to survivors in California? ➡️ I want to hear from you! 🙏🏼 Please fill out our survey: https://lnkd.in/gwmkdjtn The 19th is reporting on housing challenges for domestic violence survivors in California. We know many people stay in abusive relationships due to housing insecurity, and many women become homeless due to fleeing violence. We also know critical programs are at risk of being defunded. We need your help to understand what’s at stake with federal budget cuts, funding priorities and the state budget. Who we want to hear from: Organizations that receive public funding to help people access housing – including emergency, temporary, transitional and permanent housing. If you work in domestic violence services and help survivors seek out housing, we would love to hear from you too. How we will use this information: Survey responses will serve two purposes: To inform our reporting and to produce resources to help survivors navigate housing needs. Some questions will be shared with California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, but there is an option to keep your responses private to The 19th. About us: The 19th is an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting at the intersection of gender, politics, policy and power. This project is supported by the USC Center for Health Journalism Domestic Violence Impact Reporting Fund. I am a reporter based in Los Angeles who has been covering funding challenges for domestic violence services extensively and am leading this effort. Deadline: April 28, 2026 You can always reach me over email [email redacted] or securely on Signal (username: jsmn.01) if preferred. Your privacy and security is important to us. All of the questions are optional, and are welcome to share as much or as little as you are comfortable with. We will contact you directly if we wish to use any of your information in a story. Read more about the project and how we will use this information on the survey form itself. Please share! THANK YOU! https://lnkd.in/gwmkdjtn

19thnews.org logo19thnews.org

Electric Vehicle Owners - Denied Access to Event & Driving Data

Four weeks. That's how long I'd had my brand new, all-electric 2026 Toyota bZ when a driver struck my vehicle on I-405, hitting the side of the car where my toddler and my elderly mother were sitting. A vehicle equipped with dozens of sensors, cameras, and onboard AI systems that monitor everything from lane positioning to braking patterns in real time. My car knew exactly what happened. Every input, every output, every millisecond of data leading up to and through the impact. I can't access any of it. When I contacted Toyota about retrieving my vehicle's Event Data Recorder and driving data, I hit a wall that had nothing to do with technology and everything to do with policy. The car collected the data. The car used the data. But the person behind the wheel, the person whose driving generated that data in the first place, has no meaningful right to it under current U.S. law. In Europe, this would be a different conversation. GDPR Article 15 gives individuals the right to access personal data collected about them. Article 20 gives them the right to receive it in a portable format. If my car knows everything about how I drive, European law says I have the right to see what it knows. U.S. law says almost nothing. This isn't a niche automotive issue. It's the consumer rights question of the next decade. Every AI-enabled product we interact with, our cars, our phones, our home devices, our workplace tools, is collecting behavioral data, building models from it, and making decisions based on it. The gap between what these systems know and what they make available to the humans generating that data is growing wider, not narrower. We talk a lot about AI transparency in this industry. Usually we mean model explainability or algorithmic bias. But there's a more fundamental layer: do you have the right to see what an AI system recorded about you? Can you access the data your own behavior generated? And if not, who does that data actually belong to? My car knew everything and said nothing. That's not a technology problem. That's a design choice protected by a regulatory vacuum. And until we close that gap, every person interacting with an AI-enabled product is generating value they can't access, can't verify, and can't use in their own defense. This is one of several edge cases I'm exploring in a book I'm developing on AI's unresolved boundaries:https://lnkd.in/diQ4zcww I'd love to hear from my network. Have you ever been unable to access data that was yours? A vehicle, a medical device, a fitness tracker, a workplace tool that knew more about your behavior than you were allowed to see? Or do you have thoughts on where data privacy rights need to go from here? Drop your story or perspective in the comments or shoot me a DM, I would love to connect!

UK Adults 18-40 Living at Home - Impact on Intimacy & Sex Life

Are you currently in a relationship but still living at home with your parents? We’re looking to speak with individuals who live at home with their parents and feel their living situation has impacted their sex lives and ability to be intimate - whether that’s lack of privacy, awkward moments, or having to get creative when it comes to maintaining a healthy sex life. We are particularly interested in how financial pressures and living arrangements are influencing your opportunities for privacy, intimacy, and fulfilling sexual experiences. We want to hear honest, real-life experiences - the challenges, the workarounds, and how it’s affected your intimate relationships. We’re looking for people who: Are between 18-40 years old and based in the UK Are currently in a relationship and living at home (e.g. with parents or family) OR single and living at home Feel that living at home has impacted your ability to be intimate and your sex life Are happy to speak openly with journalists for an interview about your experience on this subject matter (e.g. with newspapers or magazines) Are comfortable being named and sharing supporting images to be used by press In return, participants will receive a £75 voucher (retailer of choice) as a thank you for your time. If this sounds like you, or someone you know, please get in touch for more details on [email redacted] with a few details of your story and contact details. Thanks

CISOs & Privacy Officers - Humanoid Robots & Inference Data Governance

A $4,370 Humanoid Robot showed up on AliExpress. The Hardware Is the Least Interesting Part. You can now order a robot the same way you'd buy a phone case. A 4-foot, 50-pound humanoid with an onboard LLM Ships soon. No waiting list. No enterprise contract. Just a cart and a checkout button. The tech press is writing about cartwheels and wheel kicks. I'm writing about what happens next. The real story isn't the body. It's the layer running on top of it. The R1 comes with a multimodal LLM: voice recognition, image recognition, command processing. That means it is not just a mechanical chassis. It's a sensory endpoint. A listener. A watcher. An agent operating inside your physical space, inferencing on what it sees and hears, and feeding that data through a model. We've spent years debating the privacy implications of smart speakers and phone cameras. Those are passive by comparison. A humanoid robot in your home or lab is an always-on, spatially-aware intelligence node. "Your address tells a story. Your house tells an even better one: if you have a robot walking through it." I've spent years studying how data brokers reconstruct identity from fragments: location pings, purchase history, social graph signals. The LOCUS work we do at BHIL maps what your address reveals about you before anyone ever steps through the door. What happens to that threat model when the sensor has legs? The democratization argument cuts both ways. But "democratization" has always had a shadow. When capability becomes cheap, it doesn't just flow to research institutions. It flows to everyone. And the LLM layer means this isn't a dumb actuator: it's a model with context, memory potential, and connectivity. We are somewhere between 18 and 36 months from humanoid robots being a normal fixture in commercial environments: warehouses, hospitals, retail, hospitality. The personal and professional data exposure surface is about to change in ways most organizations haven't started modeling. Three questions you should be asking right now. 1. What is your data governance policy for AI-enabled physical agents in your space?Most companies have a BYOD policy. Almost none have a BYOB policy ( bring your own bot. ) 2. Who owns the inference data?When a robot processes what it sees in your facility, what does the model retain? Where does it go? The terms of service conversations that defined the social media era are coming for physical AI. 3. How do you build persona-aware intelligence workflows when the data source is embodied?The frameworks we use to analyze human behavior from digital signals were built for screens. The robot is the delivery mechanism. The intelligence layer is the product. The data it generates is the asset. We're not in the era of "should we think about this." We're in the era of "this is already in a cart." I'm curious what you're seeing in your sector. Are clients asking about this yet? Are your risk teams? Drop a comment or reach out.

UK Adults 18-40 Living With Parents - Impact on Sex Life & Intimacy

Are you currently in a relationship but still living at home with your parents? £75 for your story. We’re looking to speak with individuals who live at home with their parents and feel their living situation has impacted their sex lives and ability to be intimate - whether that’s lack of privacy, awkward moments, or having to get creative when it comes to maintaining a healthy sex life. We are particularly interested in how financial pressures and living arrangements are influencing your opportunities for privacy, intimacy, and fulfilling sexual experiences. We want to hear honest, real-life experiences - the challenges, the workarounds, and how it’s affected your intimate relationships. We’re looking for people who: Are between 18-40 years old and based in the UK Are currently in a relationship and living at home (e.g. with parents or family) OR single and living at home Feel that living at home has impacted your ability to be intimate and your sex life Are happy to speak openly with journalists for an interview about your experience on this subject matter (e.g. with newspapers or magazines) Are comfortable being named and sharing supporting images to be used by press In return, participants will receive a £75 voucher (retailer of choice) as a thank you for your time. If this sounds like you, or someone you know, please get in touch for more details. Email [email redacted] with PARENTS in the subject line. Thanks

Australian ECEC Directors & Providers - Children's Data Privacy Audit

Every ECEC service in Australia collects data about children. Enrolment forms. Developmental records. Medication. Incidents. Daily observations. Photos. More and more of it held not by the service itself, but by third-party platforms they chose, set up, and handed the keys to. Most directors have no idea what happens to that data after it leaves their system. That's not a criticism. It's a structural problem. The platforms are complex, the privacy policies are written for lawyers, and nobody in the sector has sat down and actually measured what these tools do against what Australian law requires. Guarding Little Footprints is a research project auditing the data privacy and security practices of the platforms used in Australian early childhood education and care. Each platform gets assessed against the Australian Privacy Principles, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and OWASP application security standards, using only publicly available information. The goal isn't to name and shame. It's to give the sector (directors, approved providers, peak bodies, and regulators) an evidence base they don't currently have. I'll be sharing findings here as the research progresses. If you work in ECEC, advise services, or care about children's data rights, I want to hear from you. Which platforms are you using? What questions do you wish someone would answer? Drop them in the comments. Your experience shapes where this research goes.

Charlie Health Employees & Patients - IOP Scaling & Medicaid Billing

Is this really about access, or are we just creating an assembly line? I survived the troubled-teen industry and have spent my career researching how profit-driven systems can exploit people when they are most vulnerable. In my latest Substack, I take a close look at Charlie Health, a fast-growing virtual IOP company that has taken the industry by storm. Technology can help fill gaps, but in behavioral healthcare, scaling up always changes the care itself. Here’s what my analysis reveals: The MSO Mirage: This legal structure allows venture-backed companies to grow quickly while avoiding direct responsibility for clinical care. The Newport Blueprint: Newport Healthcare’s high-volume referral strategy has now been automated and digitized. Care by Dashboard: Some internal reports allege that 'Performance Improvement Plans' are based on survey response rates rather than actual clinical outcomes. The Oregon Inquiry: State regulators are now asking tough questions about unlicensed staff and over $15 million in Medicaid billing. Families in crisis don’t care about 'scalability' or 'throughput.' They want steady, ongoing care. If we swap real, sometimes complicated psychological work for standardized, numbers-based interactions, we aren’t solving the crisis. We’re just moving people through the system. You can read the full investigation here: https://lnkd.in/e6j-p6HT 🗣️ I always want to hear from people on the front lines. If you are a current or former patient, family member, or employee at Charlie Health or Newport, please reach out to me at [email redacted]. Your privacy and anonymity are extremely important to me. #BehavioralHealth #HealthcareReform #CharlieHealth #PrivateEquity #SystemicAnalysis #MentalHealthAdvocacy #SellingSanity

Never Miss a Privacy Journo Request

Get instant alerts when Privacy journalists post new journo requests. Join the community of sources landing media opportunities daily.